Stdptr Fun Function In C++

In this article, we will discuss the std::ptr_fuc function in C++ with its syntax, functions, and examples.

Introduction

The 'std::ptr_fun' used to be a function template in the C++ Standard Library that aimed to convert a function pointer into a function object. It was created as part of the tools in C++ to simplify working with function pointers along with algorithms and other function objects.

It was initially introduced in the C++98 standard 'std::ptrfun' and served as a bridge between C-style function pointers and the adaptable function objects used in the C++ programming approach. It allowed developers to adapt functions for use in situations requiring function objects, such as with algorithms like 'std::foreach' or 'std::transform'.

However, as C++ evolved and incorporated language features, the necessity for 'std::ptr_fun' decreased. This functionality was labeled deprecated in C++11 and eventually removed in C++17 as newer language features and components within the library provided versatile ways to achieve similar functionalities.

While understanding 'std::ptr_fun' can still be valuable for maintaining codebases and acknowledging advancements in programming support, contemporary C++ development often opts for methods to accomplish goals.

Syntax:

There are two versions of std::ptrfun function in C++. The syntax for using std::ptrfun are as follows;

1. For functions that take one argument (Unary).
Example
Copy
template <class Arg, class Result>
pointer_to_unary_function<Arg Result> ptr_fun(Result (*f)(Arg));
Try it Yourself
2. For functions that take two arguments (Binary).
Example
Copy
template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Result>
pointer_to_binary_function<Arg1, Arg2 Result> ptr_fun(Result (*f)(Arg1, Arg2));
Try it Yourself

Syntax Usage:

• ✅ Here is an example of how to use a function.
Example
Copy
#include <functional>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>

int square(int x) {
  return x * x;
}

stdvector<int> numbers = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
stdtransform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), numbers.begin() 
        stdptr_fun(square));
Try it Yourself
• ✅ Here is another example of using a function in code.
Example
Copy
#include <functional>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>

int multiply(int x, int y) {
  return x * y;
}

stdvector<int> numbers = {1, 2 3 4 5};
int factor = 2;
stdtransform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), numbers.begin() 
        stdbind2nd(stdptr_fun(multiply) factor));
Try it Yourself

In these cases, ptrfun is used to wrap the function pointers square, multiply them, and then convert them into function objects that work with algorithms like std::transform. These examples demonstrate how ptrfun is used, and modern C++ offers approaches such as expressions or std functions to achieve similar results.

Purpose and Functionality

The main goal of std::ptr_fun was to transform function pointers into function objects that could be applied to C++ algorithms and other components that require function objects. It acted as a link between C-style function pointers and the advanced functional programming features of C++.

Key Features:

Several key features of the std::ptr_fun are as follows:

• ✅ Converting function pointers to function objects: The std::ptr_fun function accepted a function pointer as input. It returns a wrapped function object.
• ✅ Ensuring type safety: It maintained the type information of the function pointer, guaranteeing usage in templates and algorithms.
• ✅ Compatibility with algorithms: The resulting function objects could be directly used with algorithms, such as stdtransform, stdfor_each and others.
• ✅ Handling both binary functions: It could encapsulate functions that take one or two arguments.

Examples:

Here are a few instances displaying the utilization of std::ptr_fun in C++.

1. Using ptr_fun with std::transform:

#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>

double half(int x) {
    return x / 2.0;
}

int main() {
    std::vector<int> numbers = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10};
    std::vector<double> results(numbers.size());

    std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), results.begin(),
                   [](int x) { return half(x); });

    for (double result: results) {
        std::cout << result << " ";
    }
    return 0;
}

Output:

1 2 3 4 5

2. Using ptr_fun with std::find_if:

#include <functional>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>

bool is_even(int x) {
    return x % 2 == 0;
}

int main() {
    std::vector<int> numbers = {1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12};

    auto it = std::find_if(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(),
                           std::ptr_fun(is_even));

    if (it != numbers.end()) {
        std::cout << "First even number: " << *it;
    }
}

Output:

First even number: 8

3. Using ptr_fun with a binary function and std::bind2nd:

#include <functional>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>

bool is_divisible(int x, int divisor) {
    return x % divisor == 0;
}

int main() {
    std::vector<int> numbers = {12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30};

    auto it = std::find_if(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(),
                           std::bind2nd(std::ptr_fun(is_divisible), 3));

    if (it != numbers.end()) {
        std::cout << "First number divisible by 3: " << *it;
    }
}

Output:

First number divisible by 3: 12

4. Using std::ptr_fun with std::sort and a binary function:

#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <functional>
#include <iostream>

bool compare(int a, int b) {
    return a > b;  // for descending order
}

int main() {
    std::vector<int> numbers = {3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9, 2, 6};

    std::sort(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), std::ptr_fun(compare));

    for (int num : numbers) {
        std::cout << num << " ";
    }
    
}

Output:

9 6 5 4 3 2 1 1

5. Using std::ptr_fun with std::for_each:

#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <functional>
#include <iostream>

void print_square(int x) {
    std::cout << x * x << " ";
}

int main() {
    std::vector<int> numbers = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};

    std::for_each(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(),
                  std::ptr_fun(print_square));
    
}

Output:

1 4 9 16 25

These instances show how 'std::ptr_fun' was utilized to encapsulate function pointers, enabling their use with algorithms and various components of the C++ Standard Library that require function objects.

Deprecation and Elimination

1. Deprecation in C++11:

The official deprecation of 'std::ptr_fun' came with the introduction of the C++11 standard in 2011. Although it indicated that the function was still usable, it was not recommended, and compilers were advised to give warnings when it was utilized.

2. Removal in C++17:

With the release of the C++17 standard in 2017, the 'std::ptrfun' was completely removed from the C++ Standard Library. Consequently, any code relying on 'std::ptrfun' will not be compatible with compilers adhering to the C++17 standard without enabling legacy support.

3. Reasons for deprecation:

• ✅ The adoption of expressions in C++11 rendered 'ptr_fun' outdated.
• ✅ Modern C++ offers efficient methods for generating function objects.
• ✅ The standard library has evolved to work with regular function pointers, reducing the necessity for explicit adapters.

4. Compiler Notifications:

When using 'std::ptr_fun' in code compiled under C++11 or later standards, most contemporary compilers will issue warnings. These warnings typically recommend using 'std function' or lambda expressions as alternatives.

5. Impact on existing code:

• ✅ Existing code utilizing 'std::ptr_fun' may require updates to ensure compatibility with C++ standards.
• ✅ This frequently requires substituting 'ptr_fun' with expressions or using function pointers directly.

The phasing out and elimination of std::ptrfun demonstrate C++'s progress, highlighting the shift towards adaptable and effective programming techniques. While programmers dealing with code may encounter ptrfun, it is recommended that new code adopt the methods offered by modern C++.

Limitations and Considerations

Here are some limitations and considerations to keep in mind when using 'std::ptr_fun';

• ✅ Limited to Function Pointers: The 'std::ptr_fun' function is designed to work with function pointers and cannot handle member functions or functors, which limits its flexibility compared to modern options.
• ✅ No State Handling: Unlike closures or function objects, 'std::ptr_fun' cannot capture or hold state information, making it less suitable for scenarios where contextual data is needed.
• ✅ Performance Impact: While generally minimal, there is a performance associated with the function object wrapper created using 'std::ptr_fun'.
• ✅ Type Rigidity: The function pointer being wrapped must precisely match the expected signature potentially causing issues with conversions that might be accepted with raw function pointers.
• ✅ Verbosity in Syntax: Using 'std::ptr_fun' tends to result in code that's more verbose and less readable compared to alternatives like lambda expressions.
• ✅ Lack of Overloaded Function Support: When dealing with functions, extra casting may be required to specify which overload should be used in conjunction with 'std::ptr_fun'.
• ✅ Longer Compilation Times: Utilizing 'std::ptr_fun' could lead to increased compilation times due to the need for template instantiations.
• ✅ There are no opportunities for optimization because modern compilers are often better at optimizing expressions than they were with 'std::ptr_fun' wrappers.
• ✅ Compatibility with C++11: The use of 'std::ptr_fun' became less common and less portable as newer C++ standards like C++11 were introduced.
• ✅ Debugging information is limited: The wrapper generated by 'stdptr_fun' could complicate debugging by introducing a layer of indirection.
• ✅ There is no support for lambdas: Unlike lambda expressions, the 'std::ptr_fun' couldn't be used to create generic function objects with auto parameters.

Here is an example illustrating some of these limitations;

#include <functional>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>

// Overloaded functions
void print(int x) { std::cout << "Int: " << x << std::endl; }
void print(double x) { std::cout << "Double: " << x << std::endl; }

int main() {
    std::vector<int> v = {1, 2, 3};
    
    // Using a lambda to resolve the ambiguity
    std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) { print(x); });
    
    // Using a lambda to capture local variables
    int factor = 2;
    std::transform(v.begin(), v.end(), v.begin(),
                   [factor](int x) { return x * factor; });
    
    // Print the transformed vector
    std::cout << "Transformed vector: ";
    for (int x : v) {
        std::cout << x << " ";
    }
    std::cout << std::endl;
    
    return 0;
}

Output:

Int: 1
Int: 2
Int: 3
Transformed vector: 2 4 6

The constraints and factors mentioned eventually resulted in the discontinuation and elimination of 'std::ptr_fun' in C++ in favor of versatile and robust alternatives.